Selecting Health Technology for the Triple Aim – Institute for Healthcare Improvement

 

The trend of investing in digital health technology is growing – over $1.4 billion was invested in 2012, and 2013 saw a 25 percent increase in investment over a comparable period in the prior year. Last summer, IHI’s Innovation Team conducted a project to scan for health technology innovations that would provide the greatest value for organizations seeking to achieve the IHI Triple Aim – better care, better health for populations, and lower per capita costs. A new report stemming from that project is now freely available on IHI.org. The report offers an analysis and a Digital Health Selection Framework to guide patients, providers, and payers through the assessment of technology. Both the analysis and framework reveal multiple trends that suggest a failure by developers to adequately address market demand for evidence-based technology that supports organizations pursuing the Triple Aim.

One Chance To Get It Right: Improving People’s Experience Of Care In The Last Few Days And Hours Of Life – Leadership Alliance for the Care of Dying People

The Leadership Alliance for the Care of Dying People, made up of 21 national health and care organisations, has published this report to form a response to the recommendations set out in More Care, Less Pathway, the independent review of the Liverpool Care Pathway. It sets out the approach to caring for dying people that health and care organisations and staff caring for dying people in England should adopt in future. The approach should be applied irrespective of the place in which someone is dying: hospital, hospice, own or other home and during transfers between different setting. The Priorities for Care are that, when it is thought that a person may die within the next few days or hours..

  1. this possibility is recognised and communicated clearly, decisions made and actions taken in accordance with the person’s needs and wishes, and these are regularly reviewed and decisions revised accordingly.
  2. Sensitive communication takes place between staff and the dying person, and those identiied as important to them.
  3. the dying person, and those identiied as important to them, are involved in decisions about treatment and care to the extent that the dying person wants.
  4. the needs of families and others identiied as important to the dying person are actively explored, respected and met as far as possible.
  5. an individual plan of care, which includes food and drink, symptom control and psychological, social and spiritual support, is agreed, co-ordinated and delivered with compassion.

Additional Items

Commissioning Home Care For Older People – Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE)

This guide captures the latest research findings on this important and emerging area of social care. It also provides some practice examples of good work in this area. The guide is aimed at health and social care commissioners of home care services for older people with complex needs. Providers of these care services may also find it useful. It recommends:

Assessment

Commissioners should:

  • develop their understanding of older people with complex needs and see them as people rather than as a series of individual needs
  • involve older people who use services and their unpaid and paid carers in designing services
  • understand the particular needs of older people within their local area and look at what provision already exists in the area
  • establish clear and unambiguous criteria for acceptance into domiciliary care services that are designed to address unmet needs.

Planning

Commissioners should:

  • develop values that inspire a positive attitude to home care such as flexibility and person-centeredness
  • design a clear plan of how to commission integrated services to improve the outcomes that can be achieved
  • work together with others, involving users and unpaid carers and encouraging health and social care staff to work together too
  • consider a single point of entry to services
  • investigate the role that assistive technology can play.

Contracting

Commissioners should:

  • use evidence-based intervention programmes
  • create diversity among providers
  • think about how effective provision can be achieved with existing staff
  • make sure that staff development and training are considered in the contracting model
  • embed an outcomes-based approach in the contracting process
  • contract with clear expectations regarding quality of care
  • have robust contractual arrangements in place and monitor outcomes.

Monitoring

Commissioners should:

  • move away from task-focused to outcomes-based commissioning
  • develop quality monitoring methods that place older people’s views at the heart of assessing quality of care
  • think about the impact on carers when commissioning increases the number of care packages that people receive at home
  • pay attention to the extra needs of people from black and minority ethnic groups and other excluded groups.

Future organisational models for the NHS: Perspectives for the Dalton review – The King’s Fund

Report from the King’s Fund that finds:

  • Most of the organisational models reviewed (buddying, learning and clinical networks, partnerships and joint ventures, managerial/operational franchise, mergers, and hospital chains) could help drive improvements in the quality of NHS services.
  • The higher the degree of organisational change, the higher the risk that the benefits will not be delivered
  • Common success factors across all the different organisational models include: good working relationships; a strong and shared focus on quality improvement that can be measured; and a focus on changing organisational culture.
  • The skills required to lead different organisational models are often different from those required to run a successful single institution.
  • There is also growing consensus that a trust’s problems cannot be solved without taking a whole system solution and perspective.

Additional Item